
Both Passive Power Factor Correction(PPFC) and Active Power Factor Correction(APFC) are used to improve power factor and reduce reactive power, but they differ in complexity, cost, and performance.
Method: Uses passive components (capacitors, reactors, or filters) to compensate for reactive power.
Used to compensate for lagging (inductive) power factor (common in motors, transformers).
Fixed Capacitors: Manually switched, best for stable loads.
Automatic Capacitor Banks: Contactor Switched /TSC (Thyristor-Switched Capacitor) banks adjust based on load changes.
Used when nonlinear loads (VFDs, SMPS) introduce harmonics.
Tuned to block specific harmonic frequencies (e.g., 5th, 7th).
Rotating machines that act as variable capacitors/inductors.
Used in high-voltage transmission systems.
Method: Uses power electronics (IGBTs, PWM control) to dynamically adjust reactive power.
Uses a boost converter to shape input current to match voltage (PF ≈ 0.99).
Common in computers, LED drivers, and industrial power supplies.
Use IGBT or Combines TSC (Thyristor-Switched Capacitors) and TCR (Thyristor-Controlled Reactors).
Adjusts compensation in real-time for large industrial loads.
Voltage-Source Converter (VSC) generates reactive power dynamically.
Faster than SVC, used in wind farms and smart grids.
Use Passive PFC if:
Load is stable (e.g., motors, HVAC).
Budget is limited.
No rapid load fluctuations.
Use Active PFC if:
Load varies quickly (e.g., cranes, welding machines).
Harmonics are a concern (data centers, VFDs).
High precision is needed (smart grids, renewables).
Passive PFC is simple, cheap, and reliable but lacks flexibility.
Active PFC is advanced, fast, and versatile but more expensive.
Eng. Xu
Subscribe to us to enjoy event prices and get some of the best prices.